| Does Eating Raw Foods Make Sense in the North |
| Written by Frederick Patenaude |
| Monday, 11 August 2008 21:29 |
|
Have you bought the idea that a completely raw food diet is the ultimate, most logical, best diet for all humankind, no matter where they live in the world? Do you picture eskimos eating watermelon? It seems to me that this is the implied idea transmitted by many raw-foodists, who claim that raw food is the good way and cooked food is evil. I'm exaggerating, but is this attitude in any way true? Would it be possible that the resources required to transport those foods could actually make the raw food diet unecological, considering the fact that eating a diet of bananas and mangoes in Northern Canada isn't the most natural choice? How much food do you need as a 100% raw food eater? It's fairly well-known that anyone deciding to eat only raw foods in a sustainable way needs to eat a tremendous quantity of fresh fruits and vegetables. In order to get enough calories from fruits and vegetables, without using too much raw fat (which would be detrimental for health), here's the average amount of food that's necessary:
I based those numbers on average consumption most 100% raw foodists go through in a typical day, at least those who are not on a detox program. So basically, it works out to 70 to 100 pounds of food per week! That's a lot. Where does your food come from? If we would want to get a more accurate picture on the ecological impact that eating a large quantity of imported fruits would have versus a smaller quantity of local cooked, animal or grain foods, we would need to analyze a lot of variables. I haven't been able to get an accurate estimate from the data that's available. But just knowing that most imported fruits come from fairly far away, and that large quantities are necessary on a completely raw food diet, I can draw the obvious conclusion that eating this way is not necessarily the most logical, natural and ecological choice. Consider that:
All of the fossil fuels used to transport all of these foods leave an impact, which may offset or even counter-balance the possible environmental benefits of choosing a raw vegan diet (which requires less resources when produced locally), versus a local diet that would contain both raw and cooked foods. It's always been obvious to me that a diet of all raw foods in Canada makes less sense on many levels than one that includes some cooked foods, more local foods and fewer imported fruits. There's also the fact that these fruits are picked unripe in many cases, the acidity level is too high, and the nutrient level too low. So is the solution for all raw-food enthusiasts to move to the tropics? Certainly not! My point is:
Here's a list of some additional tips to enable you to eat more ecologically and sustainably, while incorporating more raw fruits and vegetables in your diet, no matter where you live:
Finally, I would like to encourage you to continue making the best choices for your health. Sometimes, that may sometimes mean:
Look at true consequences of your own choices, and realize that there's not one size that fits all. About the Author: Frederic Patenaude is the author of "The Raw Secrets" and offers an ezine, FredericPatenaude.com. |




